Colorado Senate advances bill for $3.5 billion of roads and bridges


By James Anderson, Associated Press

Colorado’s Senate late Wednesday tentatively approved a bill to ask voters next year if the state can issue $3.5 billion in bonds for roads and bridges while injecting a one-time installment of $500 million into transportation projects.

The amended bill would ask voters in 2019 whether to devote $250 million from the general fund each year to back the bonds, which are expected to cost up to $5 billion over 20 years. It originally called for asking voters to decide this November whether to devote 10 percent of each year’s general fund revenues to the bonds.

If approved, the bonds would replace most of the nearly $1.9 billion in transportation bonds lawmakers agreed to last year. Those were backed by leasing out state buildings.

The ballot delay — and change of payment source — came after negotiations between Democrats who worried a future recession could jeopardize the state’s ability to keep up with bond payments and Republicans who say higher tax revenues should go to roads. GOP leaders were encouraged by economic forecasts this week that project up to $1.2 billion in unanticipated revenue next fiscal year.

Competing road-funding initiatives may appear on the November ballot and would jeopardize the Legislature’s own ballot proposal this year.

The $500 million included in the version adopted Wednesday matches a budget request by Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper for transportation funding. It also comes shortly before the Joint Budget Committee releases its fiscal year 2018-2019 budget proposal to lawmakers.

A final vote in the Republican-led Senate vote is needed before the bill goes to the Democrat-led House. House leaders, including Speaker Crisanta Duran, have objected to using existing tax dollars to back bonds, citing the need to fund Colorado’s public schools and other priorities.

GOP Sen. Tim Neville objected to the one-year delay. Colorado has a $9 billion backlog in roads projects, and Hickenlooper has called the lack of investment a threat to the state’s economy.

“It kicks the can down the road with a hope and a promise,” Neville said of the delay.

But Democratic Sen. Rachel Zenzinger had argued that rushing a vote would only add uncertainty for construction projects either in the planning stage or that typically depend on federal as well as state and local funds.

For years, Colorado lawmakers have struggled to pay for the state’s aging roads infrastructure. The state Constitution requires voter approval of any tax increase, and Colorado’s state gasoline tax of 22 cents a gallon was last raised in 1993. That tax helps fund roads.

Recent debate on the bill was prolonged by minority Democrats’ protests of what they consider light punishment given to Sen. Randy Baumgardner, a co-sponsor of the bill, over workplace harassment allegations. Baumgardner stepped down as chair of the Senate transportation committee while denying wrongdoing.

Thanks for reading another Denverite story

Looks like you’re the type of person who reads to the ends of articles! Well, true believer, you might really like our morning newsletter. It’s quick, free and gets you up to speed on the important and delightful things happening right here in Denver. Does Denverite help you feel more connected to what’s up in your area? Do you want to be a part of it?

Member donations are critical to our continued existence and growth.

Weird times

Denverite is powered by you. In these weird times, the local vigilance, the local context, the local flavor — it’s powered through your donations. If you’d miss Denverite if it disappeared tomorrow, donate today.

You’re our superpower

Denverite supporters have made the decision to financially support local journalism that matters to you. Ready to tell your networks why? Sharing our “About” page with your own personal comments could really help us out.

You’re our superpower

Denverite members have made the decision to financially support local journalism that matters to you. Ready to tell your networks why? Sharing our “About” page with your own personal comments could really help us out.